 |
Commenter: Killamanjaro The slayer one does the same. Noticed during in RVR (they didn't have Rampage up). Thank you |
|
|
Commenter: Unionum So pretty bad situation , both bugged. |
|
|
Commenter: Killamanjaro Remember that parry is versus an opponents Str stat so the reduction you may see may be paper doll only. Hit .getstat when you are in a fight before and after (you see the debuff). |
|
|
Commenter: Killamanjaro An example is your parry contribution from Wep Skill is probably not greater than your opponents Str. So the only real base parry you have is from renown + items + dual wield. The parry debuff at 50% will most likely be greater than those, and their strength>your wep skill. So the reality is, the debuff is going to reduce your parry to 0%. |
|
|
Commenter: Unionum WHat the hell are you talking about mate?! Skill de buffs 50% of the opponents parry , if total parry is 2 you remain with 1 . Please don't write in the bug tracker if you talk nonsense man. Shouldn't even replied to this stupidity of reply. How the fuck you reach 0 stat from 60% de buffed 50% , wats happening to your mind? You confusing the bug with the actual parry chance during a fight when you might parry 1 out of 2 or none........ HERE I talk about the bug of the de buff ability WHICH instead of DE BUFFING 50% of the PARRY reduces the stat to ZERO , and not about your REAL CHANCES to parry people during a fight , don't mess up the things. |
|
|
Commenter: Unionum Read the GOD damn tooltip everyone , take a opposite team guy, and check your parry stat after de buff. If reaches 0 then is ZERO instead of being reduces to half . So you could have 1 strength in stat and he 123132% parry chance , if you reduce that to 0 you'll still bypass even with 1 STR. How the hell this needs to be explained ffs???? |
|
|
Commenter: Killamanjaro Ok to close this one. The persons Parry (evasion) is reduced by the opponents Str when considering Parry. The remainder 'Parry' is only from items/renown, which is not greater than 50% (and thereby debuffed to 0). Working as intended. |
|
|
Commenter: Unionum I had to read it multiple times because I couldn't believe you made same confusion as the previous guy. No point to rewrite the answer, read better the above. Those who don't understand the mechanics but you think you know , please read the posts multiple times , thank you. |
|
|
Commenter: Unionum LOL I was reading the comment but not the name you clearly didn't read anything :D faking hell mate. |
|
|
Commenter: Kaelang Locking this - enough information is here to determine whether this is or isn't an issue. Appreciate the conversations throughout, but can see this derailing. |
 |
This issue is being closed as it should be fixed in the new ability system. Please create a new issue if this is not the case. |
- Anonymous
