 |
Commenter: lilimx Hey, can you add a screenshot of your combat text log, that shows, that all hots that are up and ticking? |
|
|
Commenter: Schett Here is 2 procs, the tactic heal every 3sec, and here you can see it healed within 1sec, so both procs are healing  Here is 4-5 procs  |
|
|
Commenter: Tesq tactic always stacked with itself , it's the way it work, or cleanse twice would result in 1 effect being wasted. duno how does it work with cd reduction spam and if there is a cap tought. |
|
|
Commenter: Schett > tactic always stacked with itself , it's the way it work, or cleanse twice would result in 1 effect being wasted. > > duno how does it work with cd reduction spam and if there is a cap tought. Do you mean just this tactic or tactics in general? If tactics in general stack, then I would like to see all tactics to follow same pattern like Taste of Blood on WE :D |
|
|
Commenter: Tesq this tactic since it literaly do what it say for every cleanse it do 1 hot. |
|
|
Commenter: Schett I agree with you, it does what it says. Should I start to bug report the tactics that don't stack with itself then? You have tactics that say it have a 3sec cd, which is understandable if it don't stack. But then you have other tactics for example ''Any time you take damage, there is a 25% chance that you will cause 15% more damage for 10sec''. Going with the logic that this tactic is correct, then all other tactics should stack as well, that have similar wording as this tactic. There should be a standard of knowing what tactic are supposed to stack with itself and which shouldn't. Another example is Wildfire, it should also stack with itself then ''When an enemy is hit by any Conflagration ability, there is a 25% chance that they will become covered in flames, receving 400 Elemental dmg over 5sec'' |
|
|
Commenter: Tesq "when" is not "if" +"it will also" they are prahsed differently. Can be similar to a yu-gi-oh ruling thing but well...solution likely in the mid, the cd increase always pose problems and make stuff op; simply cap to 2 the stack would suffice. |
|
|
Commenter: lilimx Okay guys...let's see what the council of Devs will say. |
 |
This issue is being closed as it should be fixed in the new ability system. Please create a new issue if this is not the case. |
- Anonymous
