View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0020386 | Return of Reckoning | General | public | 2023-08-13 04:35 | 2023-08-13 04:35 |
Reporter | ReturnOfReckoning | Assigned To | |||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
Summary | 0020386: [SM skill]: Is this a bug for "Protection of Hoeth" and "Vaul's Buffer" absorption doesn't count in the Protection... | ||||
Description | Reporter: kam19080 <!-- Issues should be unique. Check if someone else reported the issue first, and please don't report duplicates. Only ONE issue in a report. Don't forget screens or a video. --> "Protection of Hoeth" active every 10 sec for a minimum 550 absorption in 6 men, and "Vaul's Buffer" procs every 3sec after block, parry and etc for a minimum 400 absorption self. It should be a pretty high amount of protection contribution. However, it usually contributes a close amount to KOTBS and IB or other tanks at the contribution scoreboard. Is this a bug or system change for "POH" and "VB" not count as protection in the contribution scoreboard? SM is the weakest tank in tankiness of 3 order tanks, SM can deal with a high amount of absorption which can replace their weak survival ability for gaining more contribution in protection which makes them a good position for rolling crests and contribution of RVR bag. If the system doesn't count the "POH" and "VB" absorption as protection contributions at the scoreboard that might be so unfair. **Expected behavior and actual behavior:** **Steps to reproduce the problem:** **Testing Screenshots/Videos/Evidences (always needed):** <!-- Drag and drop an image file here to include it directly in the bug report, no need to upload it to another site --> <!-- Note that game critical and game breaking bugs may award a manticore/griffon (realm specific) at the leads discretion however, asking for one instantly disqualifies you from this reward. --> | ||||
Tags | Open RvR, RoR Addons, Scenarios, Scripting | ||||
Commenter: lilimx Hey, thank you for your ticket. Maybe you can post some SC pictures from your Scoreboard or so? |
|
Commenter: kam19080 [https://ibb.co/kyp066y](url) With a 550 absorption for the whole group at every 10sec in a 10mins+fight....Total: [(550*6)*6]*10=198,000 Even if it gets a 60% deduction (118,800) by out of the range or other reasons... In fact, I am just slightly more than the Chosen (without any huge amount of absorption skills) in 2000 of protection. That does so not make sense. [https://ibb.co/s9PwHNS](url) 2nd fight: Nearly equal to the BO even if he/she with the same absorption build, the protection amount in a 10mins+ fight deal with lower than 100,000 absorptions of us does so not make sense. [https://ibb.co/h2ZcMMM](url) 3rd fight: Similar to the first fight, just more than a chosen 10k absorptions in a 10mins+ fight... As a result, it seems the absorption skills of the tank aren't count toward the contribution of protection. If not, why the protection of "POH" SMs are too low? |
|
Commenter: kam19080 Thank you for your concern. |
|
Commenter: bosli42 I'm 99% sure that both groupabsorb and the selfabsorb count for protection stats, otherwise I could never top an IB guarding a slayer. Keep in mind that the groupabsorb is only 5s duration, so it will only count from groupmembers that actually get attacked during that time. And I tested scenarios with and without the selfabsorb, it makes a huge difference both for survivability as well as statpadding. |
|
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-13 04:35 | ReturnOfReckoning | New Issue | |
2023-08-13 04:35 | ReturnOfReckoning | Tag Attached: Scripting | |
2023-08-13 04:35 | ReturnOfReckoning | Tag Attached: Scenarios | |
2023-08-13 04:35 | ReturnOfReckoning | Tag Attached: Open RvR | |
2023-08-13 04:35 | ReturnOfReckoning | Tag Attached: RoR Addons | |
2023-08-13 04:35 | ReturnOfReckoning | Note Added: 0038537 | |
2023-08-13 04:35 | ReturnOfReckoning | Note Added: 0038538 | |
2023-08-13 04:35 | ReturnOfReckoning | Note Added: 0038539 | |
2023-08-13 04:35 | ReturnOfReckoning | Note Added: 0038540 |